|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| An '''import quota''' is a physical limit on the quantity or value of a good that may be imported into a country over a specified period. Quotas are a form of non-tariff trade barrier and are used to protect domestic producers, conserve foreign exchange, or manage sensitive sectors. Unlike a tariff, which raises revenue and allows imports to continue at a higher price, a quota fixes the quantity directly and transfers the resulting scarcity rent to holders of import licences. | | An '''import quota''' is a limit on the quantity of a good that may be imported during a period. Quotas are a form of non-tariff barrier to trade, and they restrict imports by quantity rather than by price. |
|
| |
|
| == Mechanisms == | | == Mechanism == |
| | A quota sets a maximum quantity that may be imported. If the quota is binding, the quantity imported equals the quota, and the domestic price rises above the world price to the level at which the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied domestically plus the quota. |
|
| |
|
| An import quota is typically administered through licences that permit holders to import up to a specified amount. Licences may be allocated by historical shares, by auction, or by administrative discretion. The scarcity created by the quota raises the domestic price above the world price, generating a rent that accrues to licence holders if licences are granted free of charge, to the government if licences are auctioned, or to foreign exporters if they can capture the rent through higher prices.
| | The difference between the domestic price and the world price is the quota rent, which accrues to whoever holds the right to import. The allocation of the rights determines who captures the rent, and the method of allocation affects the efficiency and the distributional effects of the quota. |
|
| |
|
| The domestic price effect of a quota is similar to that of an equivalent tariff. The tariff equivalent is the difference between the domestic and world price expressed as a percentage of the world price. A quota, however, provides certainty about the quantity, whereas a tariff provides certainty about the price but not the quantity.
| | == Comparison with Tariffs == |
| | A tariff and a quota can have similar effects on the quantity imported and on the domestic price. The two instruments differ in their effects on the distribution of the rents and in their response to changes in market conditions. |
|
| |
|
| == Economic effects ==
| | Under a tariff, the government captures the revenue, and the quantity imported adjusts to changes in demand and supply. Under a quota, the rent goes to the holders of the quota rights, which may be foreign exporters or domestic importers, and the quantity imported is fixed regardless of changes in demand. |
|
| |
|
| Quotas distort consumption and production decisions. Consumers pay higher prices and reduce purchases, losing consumer surplus. Domestic producers expand output at higher cost, using resources that could be employed more efficiently elsewhere. The economy suffers a deadweight loss from both the consumption distortion and the production distortion. If the rent accrues to foreign exporters, the importing country loses additionally through a terms-of-trade deterioration.
| | The quota provides more certainty about the quantity imported, which may be the objective if the concern is the volume of trade. The tariff provides more certainty about the price, and it generates revenue for the government. |
|
| |
|
| Quotas can also create rent seeking and corruption, as firms compete for licences and for the right to import. Administrative allocation is often inefficient and can entrench incumbents. Quotas may also lead to quality upgrading, as exporters shift to higher-value products within the quota, a phenomenon observed in voluntary export restraints in the automobile industry. | | == Administration == |
| | Quotas are administered through several mechanisms. The rights may be allocated to domestic importers, to foreign exporters, or through an auction. The choice affects the distribution of the rent and the efficiency of the allocation. |
|
| |
|
| == Comparison with tariffs ==
| | The allocation of the rights to foreign exporters, through voluntary export restraints, transfers the rent abroad. This has been used in trade negotiations, where the exporting country agrees to limit its exports in exchange for avoiding more restrictive measures. |
|
| |
|
| Economists generally prefer tariffs to quotas as a means of protection, on the grounds that tariffs generate revenue for the government, are transparent, and allow market forces to determine the quantity imported. Quotas allocate rents privately and are less transparent. Tariffs also adjust automatically to changes in market conditions, whereas quotas require administrative revision.
| | The allocation of the rights through an auction captures the rent for the government and allocates the rights to those who value them most. The auction is therefore more efficient than the allocation of the rights to particular firms. |
|
| |
|
| In practice, quotas are used where quantitative limits are politically easier to negotiate or where international agreements prohibit tariffs above bound levels. Voluntary export restraints, in which the exporting country limits its own shipments, are a form of quota that has been used under political pressure, though they are now largely prohibited by multilateral rules.
| | == Effects and Policy == |
| | The effects of a quota on welfare are similar to those of a tariff. The quota raises the domestic price, reduces imports, and creates a deadweight loss. It transfers income from domestic consumers to the holders of the quota rights and, where the rent is captured by foreign exporters, reduces national welfare further. |
|
| |
|
| == International rules and reform ==
| | Quotas have been used to protect domestic industries, particularly agriculture and textiles. Their use has declined as a result of trade liberalisation, which has converted quotas into tariffs and has reduced the scope for their use. |
|
| |
|
| The World Trade Organization generally prohibits quantitative restrictions on imports, with exceptions for balance-of-payments difficulties, agriculture, and safeguards. The Agreement on Textiles and Clothing phased out the quota system that had governed trade in textiles and apparel for decades, integrating the sector into normal trade rules. Tariff-rate quotas, in which a limited quantity enters at a low tariff and amounts above the quota face a higher tariff, are widely used in agriculture. | | The use of quotas raises questions about the objectives that they serve. Where the objective is to protect domestic producers, a tariff may be more transparent and more efficient. Where the objective is to limit the volume of trade, a quota may be more effective, though at a cost in terms of welfare. |
|
| |
|
| Despite their prohibition, quotas persist in various forms, including licensing requirements, technical standards, and sanitary measures that have equivalent effects. Reducing such barriers has been a central objective of trade negotiations and of regional trade agreements.
| | == Quotas and Rent Seeking == |
| | The administration of quotas creates rents, and the pursuit of these rents can divert resources from productive uses. Firms may lobby for the allocation of quota rights, and the lobbying consumes resources without creating value. |
|
| |
|
| == Quotas and rent allocation ==
| | The rent-seeking behaviour is a cost of the quota that is additional to the deadweight loss. The cost depends on the method of allocation and on the value of the rents. Where the rights are allocated administratively, the scope for rent seeking is greater. |
|
| |
|
| The allocation of quota rents is a central issue in the economics of import quotas. When licences are granted administratively, the recipients capture the difference between the domestic and world price, creating concentrated gains and incentives for lobbying and corruption. Auctions of licences can capture the rent for the government and allocate access efficiently, but they require capable administration and can be politically difficult. Allocating licences by historical market share preserves incumbents and limits competition. | | The auctioning of quota rights can reduce rent seeking, since the rights are allocated to those who value them most and the rent accrues to the government. The auction is therefore more efficient than administrative allocation, though it requires a market for the rights. |
|
| |
|
| The distribution of rents affects the welfare consequences of a quota. If rents accrue domestically, the country retains part of the transfer; if they accrue to foreign exporters, as in a voluntary export restraint, the country loses additionally. The design of quota administration therefore has significant distributional and efficiency implications, and it is a frequent subject of reform. | | == Tariffication == |
| | The reform of trade policy has involved the conversion of quotas into tariffs, a process known as tariffication. The objective is to make the protection more transparent and to reduce the distortions that quotas create. |
|
| |
|
| == Quotas in agriculture and textiles ==
| | Tariffication involves the estimation of the tariff equivalent of the quota, which is the tariff that would produce the same level of imports and the same domestic price. The estimation is difficult, since it requires information about the demand and supply conditions in the market. |
|
| |
|
| Agriculture and textiles have historically been the sectors most affected by quotas. Agricultural quotas, often implemented as tariff-rate quotas, allow a limited quantity to enter at a low tariff while imposing a higher tariff on additional imports. They balance political support for domestic producers with commitments to market access. The administration of these quotas, including the allocation of in-quota rights and the setting of fill rates, is complex and has been the subject of trade disputes.
| | The conversion of quotas into tariffs has been accompanied by the reduction of the tariffs over time, as part of trade liberalisation. The process has reduced the distortions created by quotas, though the resulting tariffs are still a source of protection. |
|
| |
|
| Textiles and apparel were governed for decades by a system of quotas under successive arrangements, which restricted exports from developing countries to developed markets. The phase-out of these quotas, completed in 2005, reshaped global production patterns and contributed to the concentration of textile production in a few competitive countries, with significant adjustment costs for others.
| | == Quantitative Restrictions and Safeguards == |
| | Quotas are used as safeguards, which are temporary restrictions imposed in response to a surge in imports that causes or threatens to cause serious injury to domestic industry. The safeguards are permitted under international trade rules, subject to conditions. |
|
| |
|
| == Trade policy in practice ==
| | The use of safeguards is subject to disciplines, including the requirement that the measures be temporary and that they be applied on a non-discriminatory basis. The measures must be notified and are subject to review. |
|
| |
|
| Although multilateral rules discourage quantitative restrictions, countries use a range of measures with similar effects, including licensing, standards, and sanitary and phytosanitary requirements. These measures can serve legitimate public objectives, such as health and safety, but they can also be used for protection. Distinguishing between the two requires analysis of their design and application, and dispute settlement has developed criteria for assessing whether measures are more trade restrictive than necessary.
| | The use of quantitative restrictions has declined as a result of trade liberalisation, but they remain in use for particular products, including agricultural goods and textiles. The rules that govern their use are part of the framework of international trade. |
|
| |
|
| Trade facilitation, transparency, and international cooperation help to limit the use of disguised quotas. Capacity building for customs and standards agencies in developing countries supports compliance with legitimate requirements without unnecessary trade restriction.
| | == Summary == |
| | Import quotas restrict trade by quantity, and their effects depend on the method of allocation of the quota rights. The administration of quotas, the process of tariffication, and the use of quantitative restrictions as safeguards are all central to the analysis of trade policy. |
|
| |
|
| == See also == | | == See also == |
| | | * Trade Policy |
| * [[Tariff]] | | * International Trade |
| * [[Trade Barrier]] | | * Export Tax |
| * [[Export Subsidy]] | |
| * [[Protectionism]]
| |
| * [[World Trade Organization]]
| |
|
| |
|
| == References == | | == References == |
|
| |
|
| | <ref name="r1">Research on non-tariff barriers and on the effects of quotas.</ref> |
| | <ref name="r2">Studies of the administration of quotas and of voluntary export restraints.</ref> |
| | <ref name="r3">Analyses of trade liberalisation and of the conversion of quotas to tariffs.</ref> |
|
| |
|
| <ref name="r1">World Trade Organization agreements on quantitative restrictions.</ref> | | <references /> |
| <ref name="r2">OECD work on non-tariff measures.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="r3">World Bank research on trade protection and reform.</ref>
| |
| <ref name="r4">International trade economics literature on quotas and tariffs.</ref>
| |
|
| |
|
| <references />
| | [[Category:Trade policy]] |
| | [[Category:International trade]] |
| | [[Category:Market structure]] |