<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Neutrality_of_Money</id>
	<title>Neutrality of Money - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Neutrality_of_Money"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Neutrality_of_Money&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-19T19:18:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Neutrality_of_Money&amp;diff=401&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Heioo: New encyclopedia entry on Neutrality of Money</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Neutrality_of_Money&amp;diff=401&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-06T05:43:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New encyclopedia entry on Neutrality of Money&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;neutrality of money&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the proposition that changes in the money supply affect only nominal variables, such as prices and nominal wages, and have no lasting effect on real variables, such as output and employment. The proposition is central to the classical dichotomy and to debates about the effects of monetary policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Classical Neutrality ==&lt;br /&gt;
In classical analysis, money is a veil: it facilitates exchange but does not affect the allocation of resources. A doubling of the money supply leads to a doubling of all prices and nominal incomes, leaving relative prices, real wages, and output unchanged. The quantity theory of money formalises this reasoning by relating the money supply to the price level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The classical view implies that monetary policy cannot affect real activity in the long run and that its principal role is to maintain price stability. It also implies that inflation is a monetary phenomenon, driven by the growth of the money supply relative to the growth of real output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Superneutrality ==&lt;br /&gt;
Superneutrality is a stronger proposition: not only does the level of the money supply not matter for real variables, but neither does its rate of growth. Under superneutrality, a change in the inflation rate has no effect on real interest rates, capital accumulation, or growth, once the nominal variables have adjusted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposition holds in simple models but fails in others. Where inflation affects the demand for money, the tax on money balances, or the allocation of resources, superneutrality may fail, and the growth of money can affect real outcomes. The empirical evidence suggests that high inflation is harmful to growth, contrary to strict superneutrality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short-Run Non-Neutrality ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the short run, money is not neutral. Sticky prices and wages mean that a change in the money supply alters real balances and real interest rates, affecting demand and output. This short-run non-neutrality is the basis for the view that monetary policy can stabilise the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The duration of the short run depends on the speed of price and wage adjustment. Where adjustment is slow, the real effects of monetary policy persist for longer. Where adjustment is rapid, the real effects are short-lived, and the classical propositions apply more quickly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Empirical Evidence ==&lt;br /&gt;
Empirical research finds that monetary shocks have significant real effects in the short run, with the effects on output diminishing over time as prices adjust. The long-run effects on output are small or negligible, consistent with long-run neutrality. The evidence therefore supports a version of the classical dichotomy in which money matters in the short run but not in the long run.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The debate about the relative importance of the short-run and long-run effects informs the design of monetary policy and the assessment of its ability to stabilise the economy. It also informs the analysis of the costs of inflation and the benefits of price stability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Classical Dichotomy ==&lt;br /&gt;
The classical dichotomy separates the determination of real variables from the determination of nominal variables. Real variables, including output, employment, and relative prices, are determined by real factors such as technology, preferences, and endowments. Nominal variables, including the price level and the money supply, are determined by monetary factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dichotomy implies that real variables are independent of the money supply, which is the essence of neutrality. The dichotomy is a useful analytical device, but it does not hold in the short run, when nominal rigidities create a link between money and real activity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neutrality and the Transmission Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The short-run non-neutrality of money depends on the transmission mechanism. When the money supply increases, the resulting increase in nominal balances lowers real interest rates, stimulating investment and consumption, and raising output. The effect persists until prices and wages adjust, restoring real balances and returning output to its potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The speed of adjustment depends on the flexibility of prices and wages and on the credibility of monetary policy. Where adjustment is slow, the real effects of money are larger and longer-lasting. Where adjustment is rapid, neutrality holds more closely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Empirical Evidence on Superneutrality ==&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence on superneutrality is mixed. Studies of the relationship between inflation and growth find that high inflation is associated with lower growth, contrary to superneutrality. The mechanism may involve the effects of inflation on the demand for money, on relative price variability, and on investment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At low inflation rates, the evidence for an effect on growth is weaker, and the relationship is less clear. The finding that inflation is harmful at high rates but not clearly so at low rates informs the design of inflation targets and the assessment of the costs of moderate inflation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications for Policy ==&lt;br /&gt;
The neutrality of money in the long run implies that monetary policy cannot permanently raise output and employment and that its principal long-run contribution is to maintain price stability. The non-neutrality of money in the short run implies that monetary policy can stabilise the economy by responding to shocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The combination of these results frames the objectives of monetary policy: to maintain price stability and, subject to that, to stabilise output and employment around their potential levels. The design of policy frameworks, including inflation targeting and the use of rules, reflects these objectives and the recognition of the lags and uncertainties involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Monetary economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Velocity of Money]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sticky Prices]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Research on the neutrality and superneutrality of money.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Studies of monetary shocks and their real effects.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Analyses of inflation, growth, and the quantity theory.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Monetary economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Macroeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Keynesian economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Heioo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>