<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Intertemporal_Choice</id>
	<title>Intertemporal Choice - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Intertemporal_Choice"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Intertemporal_Choice&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-19T19:46:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Intertemporal_Choice&amp;diff=285&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Heioo: New encyclopedia article: Intertemporal Choice</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Intertemporal_Choice&amp;diff=285&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-06T05:16:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New encyclopedia article: Intertemporal Choice&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Intertemporal choice&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the process by which individuals decide how to allocate consumption and saving over time. Rather than choosing only how much to consume now, households decide how much to consume in each period, weighing present enjoyment against future needs and against the return on saving. The theory of intertemporal choice underpins the analysis of saving, investment, and interest rates, and it provides the microeconomic foundation for the life-cycle and permanent income theories of consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The budget constraint over time ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The intertemporal budget constraint states that the present value of consumption over the individual&amp;#039;s horizon cannot exceed the present value of income plus initial wealth. Borrowing and saving allow consumption to differ from income in any period, so long as the constraint is satisfied over the horizon. This constraint formalises the idea that resources are finite and that spending more now means spending less later, unless resources grow through returns on saving.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The budget constraint can be written in terms of present values, discounting future income and consumption at the relevant interest rate. The constraint shows that a temporary increase in income need not raise consumption by the full amount, because the household can save the increase to smooth consumption over time. It also shows that a permanent increase in income raises consumption more than a temporary one, a result that distinguishes intertemporal theory from simpler, current-income models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preferences and discounting ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory assumes that individuals have preferences over the timing of consumption, summarised by a discount rate. A positive discount rate means that future consumption is valued less than present consumption, and the higher the rate, the more the individual prefers to consume now. The discount rate reflects time preference, which may be influenced by impatience, by the need for precautionary saving, and by social and institutional factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The assumption of exponential discounting, in which the discount rate is constant over time, is standard but has been challenged. Behavioural evidence shows that people often exhibit present bias, discounting the immediate future more steeply than the distant future, which can lead to procrastination and to inconsistent plans. Alternative models, including hyperbolic discounting, fit the evidence better and have implications for saving behaviour and for policy design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The intertemporal Euler equation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Optimal intertemporal choice yields an Euler equation, which states that the marginal utility of consumption today equals the discounted marginal utility of consumption tomorrow multiplied by the return on saving. Intuitively, the individual compares the benefit of consuming a unit now with the benefit of saving it and consuming more later, and adjusts until the two are equal. The Euler equation is the central condition of modern consumption theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Euler equation has testable implications. It implies that consumption growth depends on the interest rate and on the discount rate, and that unanticipated changes in income affect consumption only to the extent that they change permanent income. It also implies that, under certain assumptions, consumption should follow a random walk, a prediction that has been tested extensively and found to hold imperfectly, because of liquidity constraints, precautionary saving, and myopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intertemporal choice is applied to saving and retirement, to investment decisions, and to the evaluation of policies that have effects over time. It underpins the life-cycle model, in which households save during working years and dissave in retirement, and the permanent income hypothesis, in which consumption depends on the present value of lifetime resources. It informs the analysis of interest rates, since the demand for saving and the supply of funds determine the equilibrium rate at which the market clears.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The framework also informs policy. The effects of taxes on saving and investment depend on how they change the intertemporal price of consumption, and the design of pension systems depends on how households make saving decisions. The response to temporary income shocks, such as transfers or tax changes, depends on whether they are seen as permanent, and the analysis of sovereign debt and of fiscal sustainability uses the intertemporal budget constraint applied to the government. The theory is therefore central to both microeconomics and macroeconomics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Borrowing constraints and liquidity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key departure from the basic model is that households cannot always borrow against future income. Borrowing constraints, arising from the unwillingness of lenders to lend without collateral or from limits on consumer credit, mean that consumption may be tied to current income for some households. For such households, the response to a temporary fall in income is larger, because they cannot smooth consumption by borrowing, and the response to a temporary increase is also larger, because they spend rather than save.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presence of borrowing constraints has important policy implications. It implies that transfers and temporary tax changes have larger effects on consumption than a model without constraints would predict, because they allow constrained households to spend. It also implies that the distribution of liquidity across households matters for the aggregate response to shocks, and that measures targeted at constrained households have larger multipliers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncertainty and precautionary saving ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uncertainty about future income motivates precautionary saving, in which households save to buffer against the risk of a fall in income or an unexpected expense. The strength of the precautionary motive depends on the degree of uncertainty, on the household&amp;#039;s risk aversion, and on the availability of insurance and of credit. Where social insurance is generous and credit is available, the need for precautionary saving is lower, and consumption is less sensitive to current income.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Precautionary saving links intertemporal choice to the broader analysis of risk and social insurance. The design of unemployment insurance, health insurance, and other protections affects the saving behaviour of households and hence the level of aggregate demand. Conversely, the need for precautionary saving can justify public insurance, since private markets may not provide adequate protection against certain risks, and the provision of insurance can raise welfare and stabilise demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implications for policy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of intertemporal choice informs the design of taxation, of pensions, and of fiscal stimulus. Because the effect of a tax change depends on whether it is seen as temporary or permanent, the design of fiscal measures must consider how households perceive them. A temporary tax cut, if perceived as temporary, may be largely saved, particularly by households that are not liquidity constrained, while a permanent change in taxes has a larger effect on consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pensions and saving incentives also draw on the theory. The design of retirement saving systems affects the incentive to save, and the treatment of contributions and withdrawals determines how the tax system affects lifetime consumption. The theory provides a framework for evaluating these arrangements, and it highlights the importance of the budget constraint over the lifetime and of the responses of households to changes in incentives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Consumption Smoothing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Permanent Income Hypothesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Life Cycle Hypothesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Discount Rate]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saving]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Microeconomics and macroeconomics texts on intertemporal choice.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Journal literature on consumption and saving.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Central bank and OECD research on household behaviour.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Behavioural economics studies of time preference.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Heioo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>