<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Adaptive_Expectations</id>
	<title>Adaptive Expectations - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Adaptive_Expectations"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Adaptive_Expectations&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-19T19:46:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Adaptive_Expectations&amp;diff=332&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Heioo: New encyclopedia entry on Adaptive Expectations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.veritaswiki.org/index.php?title=Adaptive_Expectations&amp;diff=332&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-06T05:42:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New encyclopedia entry on Adaptive Expectations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Adaptive expectations&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a theory of how people form expectations about future values of economic variables, according to which expectations are revised gradually in response to past errors. Under this hypothesis, the expectation of a variable for the next period is a weighted average of the value observed in the past, with more weight given to recent observations, so that expectations adjust slowly toward actual outcomes. The concept was central to early macroeconomic models and was later challenged by the theory of rational expectations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The formation of expectations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adaptive expectations are usually formalised as a weighted average of past values, in which the expectation for the current period equals the expectation held last period plus a fraction of the error made last period. The fraction, sometimes called the coefficient of adjustment, determines the speed with which expectations respond to new information. A larger coefficient means faster adjustment, while a smaller coefficient means that expectations are slow to change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formulation implies that expectations are backward-looking, since they depend only on past observations and not on any information about current conditions or future policy. This feature gives the theory its tractability and its appeal in early models, because it allows expectations to be treated as a function of observed history, but it also makes the theory vulnerable to the criticism that it ignores information that is available and relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use in macroeconomic models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adaptive expectations were widely used in macroeconomic models in the mid-twentieth century, including in versions of the Phillips curve and in models of inflation and output. In these models, the difference between actual and expected inflation drives output and employment, because workers and firms behave on the basis of their expectations, and expectations adjust over time. The resulting dynamics generate a gradual adjustment of inflation and output after a shock, and they imply that policy can have persistent real effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The framework was used to analyse the effects of monetary and fiscal policy, and to explain the persistence of inflation and unemployment. The slower the adjustment of expectations, the longer the real effects of a change in policy, and the analysis produced a trade-off between inflation and unemployment that appeared to hold in the short run. The trade-off was central to the policy discussions of the period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The rational expectations critique ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of adaptive expectations was challenged by the theory of rational expectations, associated with John Muth and Robert Lucas, which holds that people use all available information and the structure of the economy to form expectations, so that systematic errors are not made. Under rational expectations, expectations are forward-looking and consistent with the model, and the difference between actual and expected values is unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The critique has important implications. If expectations are rational, then a fully anticipated change in policy has no real effect, because wages and prices adjust immediately, and only unanticipated changes matter. This in turn implies that the systematic use of policy to exploit the trade-off is ineffective, because agents anticipate it. The critique, and the empirical failures of models with adaptive expectations in the 1970s, led to the widespread adoption of rational expectations in macroeconomics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Learning and hybrid models ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modern work recognises that pure rational expectations may be too demanding, and it studies models in which agents learn about the economy over time, updating their beliefs as they observe data. In these models, expectations converge toward rational expectations as information accumulates, and the process of learning can generate dynamics that resemble those of adaptive expectations in the short run.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hybrid models combine forward-looking and backward-looking elements, allowing expectations to depend partly on past outcomes and partly on the model&amp;#039;s prediction. These models fit the data better than either pure form, and they are widely used in empirical and policy analysis. The debate about how expectations are actually formed, and about the extent to which they deviate from full rationality, remains central to macroeconomics and to behavioural economics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adaptive Expectations in Macroeconomic Models ==&lt;br /&gt;
The adaptive expectations hypothesis was formalised most influentially by Phillip Cagan in his 1956 study of hyperinflation and by Milton Friedman in his 1957 permanent income analysis. In Cagan&amp;#039;s formulation the expected rate of inflation adjusts each period in proportion to the discrepancy between the actual and the previously expected rate. The coefficient of adjustment, often written as a fraction between zero and one, measures how quickly expectations respond to new information. A value close to one implies near-instant adjustment, while a value close to zero implies stubborn, slow-moving beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When embedded in the expectations-augmented Phillips curve, adaptive expectations generate a sharp prediction: a sustained increase in the rate of inflation will temporarily reduce unemployment, but once workers and firms revise their expectations upward the unemployment rate returns to its natural level. This result, associated with the accelerationist hypothesis, implies that there is no permanent trade-off between inflation and unemployment and that attempts to hold unemployment below its natural rate will simply accelerate inflation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticisms and the Rational Expectations Critique ==&lt;br /&gt;
The principal objection to adaptive expectations is that it ignores all information except the history of the variable being forecast. Rational agents who knew the structure of the economy would not persist in making systematic errors, because such errors would be correctable at no cost. Robert Lucas and others argued that models built on adaptive expectations could not be used to evaluate policy, since the parameters describing expectation formation would themselves change when policy changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This so-called Lucas critique undermined the use of large-scale macroeconometric models in which expectations were modelled mechanically. A related technical problem is that adaptive expectations imply a systematic forecast bias whenever the underlying variable trends, so the forecast error is serially correlated. Modern work sometimes retains adaptive-style learning, in which agents update estimates of unknown parameters over time, because it captures observed slow adjustment of survey expectations more accurately than the full-information rational benchmark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Empirical Evidence from Survey Expectations ==&lt;br /&gt;
Directly measured expectations from household and professional surveys have been used to test the adaptive model. Studies find that inflation expectations do respond to past inflation but with a weight well below one, and that professional forecasters in particular place substantial weight on current information. The evidence suggests a hybrid process in which expectations depend both on past realisations and on signals about future policy, a specification now common in New Keynesian models used for monetary policy analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Policy Implications ==&lt;br /&gt;
For central banks the adaptive mechanism matters because credibility and communication can accelerate the adjustment of expectations. When a central bank is credible, private expectations converge more quickly toward the target, reducing the output cost of disinflation. Conversely, when expectations are strongly backward-looking, a disinflationary policy must tolerate a larger and more prolonged rise in unemployment. This insight lay behind the shift toward inflation targeting and transparent communication that began in the 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rational Expectations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Inflation Expectations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Expectations Formation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Phillips Curve]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Behavioural Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Macroeconomics textbooks on expectations and policy.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Journal literature on expectations formation and learning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Central bank research on inflation expectations.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;r4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Studies of the rational expectations critique.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Macroeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economic indicators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Keynesian economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Heioo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>